|
MRCA Documents
MRCA Docs
Set # 1
Ticket
Counts - Stop Signs!
The fine was $100 in 2007. By early
2011 it had risen to $175, but in early 2012 it was reduced to
$100. The lower fine will not be applied, retroactively, to
pre-reduction tickets.
The photo
enforcement at stop signs is by "fixed" (permanently installed)
cameras; the speed enforcement, which was canceled before it started,
was to be done by mobile units - maybe
some recycled from the City of San Jose, which in 2007 was forced
to discontinue its RedFlex photo radar program. (For more info
about San Jose, see their section, above.)
Total Violations,
Notices Printed [4]
New 9-27-09, updated 1-19-13
Cam #
|
FRDST
01
|
FRTHD
01
|
FRUST
01
|
REST
01
|
STST
01
|
TECA
01
|
TOST
01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franklin
Park
[6]
|
Franklin
[6]
|
Franklin
Park
[6]
|
Reseda
[6]
|
Hollywood
Bowl
Outlook/
Temescal
[6]
|
Temescal
[6]
|
Topanga
[6]
|
|
|
[3]
|
|
Total
Tickets
Issued
as %
of Events
Re-
corded |
Total
Violations
Recorded/
Notices
Printed
[1] [4]
|
|
12 days
Jul07
[10]
|
195
190
|
0
0
|
452
179
|
0
0
|
553
236
|
0
0
|
214
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
1414
585
|
|
Aug07
[10]
|
655
199
|
0
0
|
1076
422
|
0
0
|
1177
579
|
0
0
|
788
424
|
|
|
|
|
|
3696
1624
|
|
Sep07
[10]
|
542
169
|
0
0
|
500
256
|
922
232
|
773
436
|
52
0
|
567
334
|
|
|
|
|
|
3356
1427
|
|
Oct07
[10]
|
442
171
|
0
0
|
461
199
|
0
0
|
779
434
|
989
215
|
475
269
|
|
|
|
|
|
3146
1288
|
|
Nov07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4th Qtr 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9134
3596
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan08
[10]
|
361
131
|
0
0
|
518
160
|
329
111
|
849
241
|
432
146
|
491
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
2980
1039
|
|
Feb08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Qtr 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8752
2815
|
|
Apr08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2nd Qtr 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8462
2876
|
|
Jul08
[10] |
486
131 |
0
0
|
500
183
|
0
0
|
943
361
|
502
224
|
358
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
2789
1073
|
|
Aug08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3rd Qtr 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8094
3238
|
|
Oct08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4th Qtr 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6769
4186
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan09
[10]
|
408
205
|
0
0
|
545
314
|
148
98
|
650
422
|
329
202
|
483
324
|
|
|
|
|
|
2563
1565
|
|
Feb09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Qtr 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10331
6098
|
|
Apr09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2nd Qtr 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11975
6086
|
|
Jul09
[9]
|
280
97
|
283
107
|
424
134
|
833
339
|
902
338
|
364
210
|
672
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
3758
1525
|
|
Aug09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3rd Qtr 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11973
6007
|
|
Oct09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4th Qtr 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11015
6477
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan10
[10]
|
270
163
|
259
134
|
422
228
|
1196
686
|
1098
711
|
23
15
|
713
393
|
|
|
|
|
|
3981
2330
|
|
Feb10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Qtr 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11583
6070
|
|
Apr10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2nd Qtr 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13678
6188
|
|
Jul10
[10]
|
295
170
|
325
170
|
497
220
|
1274
545
|
1187
610
|
270
176
|
716
361
|
|
|
|
|
|
4564
2252
|
|
Aug10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3rd Qtr 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12636
5161
|
|
Oct10
[10]
|
213
88
|
252
110
|
372
107
|
696
192
|
1014
310
|
210
115
|
494
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
3251
1096
|
|
Nov10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4th Qtr 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6884
2892
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40+ months
Jul07 - Nov10
[10]
|
14485
5955
|
7204
3431
|
18863
7825
|
25795
11645
|
37252
17474
|
12808
6342
|
22858
11558
|
|
|
|
|
|
139265
64230
|
|
1st Qtr 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8117
4200
|
|
2nd Qtr 2011
|
871
332
|
1144
549
|
1452
607
|
0
0
|
3652
1472
|
591
313
|
1646
643
|
|
|
|
|
|
9356
3916
|
|
3rd Qtr 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9938
3684
|
|
4th Qtr 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7826
2832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Qtr 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8691
3831
|
|
2nd Qtr 2012
|
994
515
|
1277
734
|
1345
711
|
1635
767
|
3201
1886
|
548
392
|
1624
938
|
|
|
|
|
|
10574
5943
|
|
3rd Qtr 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10296
5679
|
|
4th Qtr 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7463
4461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cam #
|
FRDST
01
|
FRTHD
01
|
FRUST
01
|
REST
01
|
STST
01
|
TECA
01
|
TOST
01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This table
made by highwayrobbery.net, using official reports provided by the MRCA
under the
California Public Records Act.
[ ] indicates a footnote.
[1] Totals are as provided by the MRCA.
[2] YTD = Year-to-date total.
[3] Un-used columns are to allow for
later expansion of MRCA's system.
[4] Except where noted otherwise, the figures given
in the table are for the single calendar month indicated.
Any figures in (red) type enclosed in parentheses are what RedFlex
calls Total Detections and represent all incidents flashed by the
cameras; The Total Detections figures come from the official
report entitled RTS Management Report ( example) which,
beginning in 2013, highwayrobbery.net will be requesting from all
cities.
Figures in red type (without parentheses) are what RedFlex calls Total
Processed Incidents or Total Violations, and represent Total Detections
minus Nonprosecutable incidents.
The figures in black type are citations issued.
Due to time limitations, complete figures have been posted only for
selected time periods or cameras. If there is sufficient public
interest, the remaining periods or cameras will be posted.
[5] Data was requested on:
[6] The camera enforcement is believed to be in the
parks noted. See Set # 2, below, for a location map.
[7] Source data:
12+ months Jul07 - Jul08
[8] Source data: 12
months Aug08 - Jul09
[9] Source
data:
1
-
3
month
periods,
2008
-
2009
[10] Source data
received Jan. 2011
[11] Source
data
received
Jan. 2013
MRCA Docs Set
# 2
MRCA
Website, Articles
The MRCA's TicketWebsiteite
MRCA's Main
Website
Website
About
the
MRCA's
Director Alternate
Copy
If you have a ticket and want to contact
the MRCA, their number is (310) 858-3834.
The direct number to the photo stopsign
program at the MRCA is (310) 858-0117.
July
2007
Post
Article
July
2007
Local
Blog
Article
July 2007 National
Blog Article
Jan. 2008
Post Article
Apr. 2008 Post
Article
Dec. 2009 Post Article About a Defendant's Victory
In May 2010
freedomminute.com blogged about the MRCA, and that article
started a string of comments that has continued into 2012 and contains
over 500 entries.
Jul.
2011
CBS-2
Report
Aug.
21,
2011
LA
Times
Article
Aug.
24,
2011
StreetsBlog
Article
(statement
by
MRCA
Director)
Sept.
1,
2011
Post
Article
A
Mar.
15,
2012
LA
Weekly Article included this map of camera locations:

Map by Peter Hoey
An Aug.
9,
2012
LAWeekly
Article revealed that in early 2012 the fine was
reduced to $100.
I inquired with MRCA staff to find out if the lower fine will be
applied, retroactively, to tickets issued prior to the reduction. It
will not.
MRCA Docs Set
# 3
The
Contract
Evidently tired of toiling in obscurity, in March 2007 the MRCA
contracted with RedFlex for the installation of two kinds of automated
enforcement not
permitted by
California law (and found nowhere else in California): (1) Photo
enforcement at stop signs (illegal because CVC 22450,
the
usual
Code
section
for
a
stop
sign
violation,
is
not
included
in
CVC 40518, the Code section authorizing the use of a mailed
Notice to Appear), and (2) photo enforcement of speed* (illegal because
CVC 21455.6
says: "The authorization in Section 21455.5 to use automated
enforcement systems does not authorize the use of photo radar for
speed enforcement purposes by any jurisdiction").
2006
Staff
Report
Recommending
Signing
of
Contract - see item V(b) in
the report
The MRCA claims that their program is legal:
Feb. 2008 Memo by
MRCA's
Attorney
Apr. 2008 Informal
Opinion by AG
In 2010 two class action suits were filed against the MRCA, and in 2011
there was a decision by the Appellate Division (See
the Class Actions
page.)
A further illegal provision was found in the contract. The
contract's
Exhibit D specified* that MRCA would pay RedFlex $20 (fixed cam) or $40
(mobile cam) for each image processed, a blatant violation of the CVC
21455.5(g) prohibition of such "pay-per-ticket" schemes. See
Subsection B of Defect # 10.
*In May 2008 the contract was amended to
remove the provision for speed
enforcement and to set compensation to RedFlex at a flat rate of $4,400
per
month per camera location. The timing of the amendment coincided
with the
failure of SB 1325, a 2008 bill that would have allowed the use of
photo radar throughout California. (In 2006, 2008, 2009 and 2010
there were legislative efforts to allow photo radar. They failed,
but photo radar is an idea that won't go away - a new bill was launched
in Mar. 2011. See Legislation.)
In June 2012 the MRCA extended the contract for
four years, and got the price down to $3900 per camera for the first
two years and $3750 for the remaining two years.
MRCA Docs Set
# 4
More
Coming
There may be some more MRCA
information
posted in the next few
weeks. Mark
your calendar to remind you to come back here and look!
---------------------------------
RED LIGHT CAMERAS
www.highwayrobbery.net
www.highwayrobbery.net
|