|
RED LIGHT CAMERAS
|
|
www.highwayrobbery.net
|
|
Added 6-3-11 2011 Appeals
Decision - People (Napa) v. Daugherty This
case is an example of a foundational defense (see Defect
# 10 - B on the Home page). This is
the first published Appellate Division decision,
anywhere in California, regarding the legality of
a cost-neutral contract. Click on
these links for the documents in the Daugherty appeal
(chronological order): This
federal case Todd v. City of Auburn http://www.leagle.com/decision/In%20FCO%2020110331126
which was mentioned in one of the briefs linked above,
says that cost neutrality found in some cities in the
State of Washington is OK because it altered the timing of
the payment but did not limit the amount. Keep in
mind it says that it's not for publication and is not
precedent. More
info is available on the Napa Documents page, here at
highwayrobbery.net. These
materials may be freely copied and distributed, so long as
credit is given to highwayrobbery.net . Many other cases and /or
transcripts are available - see the Library
of Transcripts, Briefs, and Court Decisions.
For more details about Napa, see Napa's entry on the Camera Towns page. --------------------------------- |