|
Email Address
Site Index
If you haven't already done so,
please read the Redding section on the Camera
Towns
page.
Redding Documents
Some of Redding's tickets can possibly be
ignored. If your "ticket" does not have the Superior Court's name
and address on it, it is what I call a "Snitch Ticket." For more
details, see the Snitch Ticket section on the Your Ticket page.
Redding Docs Set # 1
Ticket Counts
Total
Violations, Notices Printed [4]
New
11-12-10, updated 1-16-13
Cam #
|
CCCY
-01
|
CYBE
-01
|
CYBE
-03
|
MALA
-01
|
MASH
-01
|
PITE
-01
|
SHMA
-01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Churn
Creek
&
Cypress
[6]
|
Cypress
&
Bechelli
[6]
|
Cypress
&
Bechelli
[6]
|
Market
&
Lake
[6]
|
Market
&
Shasta
[6]
|
Pine
&
Tehama
[6]
|
Shasta
&
Market
[6]
|
|
|
|
[3]
|
|
Total
Citations
Issued
as %
of Events
Recorded |
Total
Violations
Recorded/
Notices
Printed
[1] [4]
|
|
Aug07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep07
|
0
0
|
214
118
|
174
101
|
0
0 |
0
0 |
0
0 |
0
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
388
219
|
|
Oct07
|
0
0 |
167
69
|
120
72
|
0
0 |
0
0 |
0
0 |
0
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
287
141
|
|
Nov07
|
0
0 |
178
99
|
139
85
|
0
0 |
0
0 |
0
0 |
0
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
317
184
|
|
Dec07
|
0
0 |
157
88
|
158
114
|
0
0 |
0
0 |
0
0 |
0
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
315
202
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan08
|
0
0 |
137
69
|
139
98
|
0
0 |
0
0 |
0
0 |
0
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
276
167
|
|
Feb08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
753
465
|
|
May08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul08
|
115
45
|
99
54
|
73
17
|
0
0 |
329
189
|
0
0 |
91
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
707
327
|
|
Aug08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
554
351
|
|
Nov08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan09
|
31
13
|
71
45
|
34
25
|
95
62
|
272
165
|
0
0 |
79
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
582
348
|
|
Feb09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1369
621
|
|
May09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul09
|
33
12
|
89
52
|
41
30
|
608
218
|
200
123
|
91
27
|
81
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1143
491
|
|
Aug09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1028
514
|
|
Nov09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan10
|
15
8
|
67
38
|
33
19
|
229
102
|
153
109
|
98
76
|
72
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
667
378
|
|
Feb10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
730
444
|
|
May10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul10
|
37
15
|
126
77
|
31
19
|
221
75
|
222
139
|
120
77
|
76
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
833
419
|
|
Aug10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep10
|
27
14
|
87
60
|
45
24
|
189
76
|
192
129
|
85
60
|
92
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
717
389
|
|
Oct10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
666
356
|
|
Nov10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan11
|
18
8
|
50
28
|
27
18
|
164
70
|
112
71
|
110
84
|
70
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
551
301
|
|
Feb11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
494
297
|
|
Mar11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
612
374
|
|
Apr11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
664
333
|
|
May11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
675
329
|
|
Jun11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
664
334
|
|
Jul11
|
28
20
|
122
65
|
44
19
|
256
102
|
151
96
|
98
64
|
92
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
791
392
|
|
Aug11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
787
426
|
|
Sep11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
783
420
|
|
Oct11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
484
295
|
|
Dec11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
555
349
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan12
|
20
4
|
66
41
|
36
28
|
99
36
|
71
45
|
70
52
|
77
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439
231
|
|
Feb12
|
28
10
|
100
66
|
25
15
|
23
6
|
66
42
|
55
31
|
84
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381
207
|
|
Mar12
|
32
19
|
92
64
|
45
33
|
32
10
|
100
57
|
48
32
|
96
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
445
245
|
|
Apr12
|
40
23
|
167
120
|
60
40
|
109
62
|
137
97
|
47
39
|
84
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
644
409
|
|
May12
|
32
24
|
192
137
|
67
39
|
211
106
|
139
85
|
58
43
|
122
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
821
489
|
|
Jun12
|
43
21
|
196
133
|
69
36
|
237
102
|
132
73
|
68
46
|
111
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
856
455
|
|
Jul12
|
23
14
|
173
120
|
77
51
|
193
88
|
187
131
|
53
33
|
102
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
808
474
|
|
Aug12
|
27
14
|
196
131
|
71
53
|
254
121
|
201
135
|
59
33
|
82
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
890
507
|
|
Sep12
|
27
8
|
170
132
|
50
38
|
174
84
|
168
129
|
65
45
|
93
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
747
465
|
|
Oct12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
661
399
|
|
Nov12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
642
432
|
|
Dec12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
627
386
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[9]
|
Churn
Creek
&
Cypress
[6]
|
Cypress
&
Bechelli
[6]
|
Cypress
&
Bechelli
[6]
|
Market
&
Lake
[6]
|
Market
&
Shasta
[6]
|
Pine
&
Tehama
[6]
|
Shasta
&
Market
[6]
|
|
|
|
[3]
|
|
Total
Citations
Issued
as %
of Events
Recorded |
Total
Violations
Recorded/
Notices
Printed
[1] [4]
|
|
This table made by
highwayrobbery.net, using official reports provided
by the City under the California Public Records Act.
Official reports, 2007 - 2010
Official
reports, 2011 - 2012
Official reports,
2012
Official
reports, 2008 - 2012
[ ] indicates a footnote.
[1] Totals are as provided by the City.
[2] YTD = Year-to-date total.
[3] Un-used columns are to allow for
later expansion of City's system.
[4] Except where noted otherwise, the figures given
in the table are for the single calendar month indicated. Any
figures in red type
(or, if you are looking at this table in black and white, the upper
figure when there are two or more figures in a cell) are what RedFlex
calls Total Violations, or all incidents recorded by
the cameras. The figures in black
type are what RedFlex calls Notices Printed, and represent the
sum of genuine citations issued (those filed with the court) plus
any Nominations mailed (not filed with the court, a.k.a. Snitch
Tickets). Due to time limitations data may have been posted to the
table only for selected months or locations.
If there is sufficient public interest, the remaining months or
locations will be
posted. Full official data
has
been received and is available at one of the links given above.
[5] Monthly data was requested on:
[6] The camera enforcement is believed to be on
traffic on the first-named street, but the direction of
enforcement (north, south, east, west, thru, left, right) is not yet
available.
[7] Includes enforcement of posted "no turn on red"
signs.
[8] Official data
has
been received, is available at the last link above, but due to time
constraints has not yet been fully posted to the table above.
[9] The
title bar has been repeated solely for the
convenience of the reader - there is no difference between it and the
one at the top of the table.
Redding Docs Set # 2
"Late Time" Graphs
The City provided bar graphs
of Late Times, etcetera, for all of its cameras.
These graphs track violations recorded, not tickets issued.
Where there is a large number of long Late Time violations in a curb
lane, it is believed to indicate heavy ticketing on right turns.
(The curb lane will be the lane with the highest lane number.)

The picture above is an example from another city.
CCCY 2008
CCCY2010
CYBE-01 2008
CYBE-01 2010
CYBE-03 2008
CYBE-03 2010
MALA 2008
MALA 2010
MASH 2008
MASH 2010
PITE 2008
PITE 2010
SHMA 2008
SHMA 2010
All
cameras, 2012
Bar graphs are available for more than fifty
other cities - see the list
in the expanded version of Defect # 9.
Redding Docs Set # 3
The Contract
2007
Contract
2009
Amendment
The 2007 contract (approved 4 - 1 by
Dickerson, Murray, Stegall and Bosetti, with Jones voting "no")
includes
an illegal "cost
neutrality" clause, whereby the city does not have to pay RedFlex the
full rent if there aren't enough fines to cover the cost. See
Subsection B. of Defect # 10.
In 2009 the contract was amended (approved 4 - 1 by Dickerson,
McArthur, Stegall and Bosetti, with Jones voting "no") but cost
neutrality
was retained.
The Sept. 2011 decision in P. v. Daugherty
said that cost neutral contracts like Redding's are illegal, a
violation of CVC 21455.5(g), and gave Redding an opportunity
to cancel
the program, immediately, without paying an early-termination
penalty. The city council did not take advantage of that
opportunity
in 2011, and in June 2012 renewed the
contract for five years.
The city council agreed to pay $4500 per camera, which is
way too high. By failing to negotiate, the council wasted
$630,000, compared to a $3000 target price. See FAQ # 17.
The contract has no escape clause
(Termination for Convenience),
something commonly found in other cities' contracts.
This list of contracts and amendments
was up-to-date as of Jan. 16, 2013.
Redding Docs Set # 4
Info on RPD Site
There is program info, including a link to
signal timing sheets, at the police
department's website.
Redding Docs Set # 5
More Coming
There may be some more Redding information
posted in the next few weeks. Mark your calendar to remind you to
come back here and look!
---------------------------------
RED
LIGHT
CAMERAS
www.highwayrobbery.net
www.highwayrobbery.net
|